Difference between revisions of "Talk:Humans"
From ShivaeWiki
(Flaw in organization) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I realized there wasn't a category for the humans of Sivine Blades, but when I tried to create one I was unable to find an appropriate category name that wasn't already taken. So then I just created an article instead, only to realize that this won't work for the long term. All the rest of the species on the Sivine Blades have their own category, but this is not possible for any species occurring in multiple worlds. | + | I realized there wasn't a category for the humans of Sivine Blades, but when I tried to create one I was unable to find an appropriate category name that wasn't already taken. So then I just created an article instead, only to realize that this won't work for the long term. All the rest of the species on the Sivine Blades have their own category, but this is not possible for any species occurring in multiple worlds. |
I seem to sense a potentially huge problem here: overuse of new categories and new articles, instead of just adding to articles that already exist. Eventually you'll run out of things to call them. | I seem to sense a potentially huge problem here: overuse of new categories and new articles, instead of just adding to articles that already exist. Eventually you'll run out of things to call them. | ||
| + | Any suggestions? | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 25 October 2006
I realized there wasn't a category for the humans of Sivine Blades, but when I tried to create one I was unable to find an appropriate category name that wasn't already taken. So then I just created an article instead, only to realize that this won't work for the long term. All the rest of the species on the Sivine Blades have their own category, but this is not possible for any species occurring in multiple worlds. I seem to sense a potentially huge problem here: overuse of new categories and new articles, instead of just adding to articles that already exist. Eventually you'll run out of things to call them. Any suggestions?
